|
Ultraviolet
Radiation Monitoring
|
|
|
|
|

Importance
of UV Monitoring
The purpose of ground-level monitoring of UV radiation in
parks is twofold: (a) to determine spatial and temporal trends in UV reaching
the ground at different elevations and in different environments, and (b) to
provide an estimate of the exposure of park resources to UV-B to determine
dose-response relationships. It is widely documented that stratospheric ozone
has been reduced due to the release of chlorofluorocarbons into the atmosphere.
It is also known that this reduction in total column ozone has resulted in
increasing amounts of UV-B reaching the surface, with the largest changes being
observed in the polar regions. There is evidence that these higher levels of
UV-B radiation can be detrimental to human health and biological resources.
Resources that have been identified as sensitive to increased UV-B include
amphibians, arid-land reptiles, and marine and freshwater plant and animal
populations. In human populations, increases in UV-B are linked to higher
incidence of skin cancer, cataracts, and immune system disorders.
To increase our knowledge of the trends in this stressor and
the possible consequences to natural resources, PRIMENet focuses both research
and monitoring activities on this issue. In addition to the UV monitors placed
in the national parks, the EPA has an existing, complementary network of UV
monitors in urban areas. These include Boston, Massachusetts; Boulder, Colorado;
Gaithersburg, Maryland; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Atlanta,
Georgia; Riverside, California; and Albuquerque, New Mexico. The urban
monitors are used primarily to assess human exposure to UV-B radiation. In
addition to EPA, several other federal agencies are monitoring UV radiation,
including the USDA, NOAA, the Department of Energy, the National Science
Foundation and the Smithsonian. There are co-located UV instruments in both Big
Bend and Everglades NPs, where the USDA is currently operating their
"shadow band" instruments. A common web site for information on these
UV networks can be found at http://www.arl.noaa.gov/research/
programs/uv.html. These agencies are coordinating activities through the
"U.S. Interagency UV-Monitoring Network Plan" prepared under the
auspices of the President’s Committee on Environment and Natural Resources.
The contractor in charge of PRIMENet UV operations is the
University
of Georgia. The NPS coordinates the site operators and NOAA assists in the
quality assurance and audit program. Overall project management is headed by the
EPA-Global Change Program at the National
Exposure Research Lab in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Back to Top

Monitoring
System
 |
|
Photo of a Sci-Tec Brewer Mark IV
in the field |
Each of the fourteen PRIMENet sites are equipped with a Brewer spectrophotometer, an instrument designed to measure
different wavelengths of light, with a focus on the ultraviolet spectra (UV-B radiation is in the 300-320 nm range of light). These
instruments actively track the sun as they monitor the variation in solar irradiance throughout the day; they also record other
data, such as total column ozone and optical density. These data are then used to calculate the "dose" of UV at the surface of the
earth. Because of the influence of sun angle, clouds and other forms of air pollution, the seasonal
variation in UV-B detected at the surface is large. Therefore, it will take many years of monitoring to detect trends in the incidence of UV-B.
During 1997, six Brewer spectrophotometers operated year-round in PRIMENet parks as part of the UV Network. Brewers have been
installed in all of the remaining parks, the last of which was Hawaii Volcanoes
NP in February 1999.
Back to Top

UV Monitor Site Information.
Data available at http://www.epa.gov/uvnet.
|
Site |
Brewer ID |
Latitude (N) |
Longitude (W) |
Elevation (m) |
Dates of Operation |
|
Acadia |
138 |
44.37 |
68.26 |
122 |
03/98-present |
|
Big Bend |
130 |
29.31 |
103.18 |
1052 |
02/97-present |
|
Canyonlands |
133 |
38.45 |
109.82 |
1814 |
09/97-present |
|
Denali |
141 |
63.73 |
148.96 |
640 |
10/97-present |
|
Everglades |
135 |
25.39 |
80.68 |
2 |
03/97-present |
|
Glacier |
134 |
48.51 |
113.10 |
968 |
09/97-present |
|
Great Smoky Mtns. |
132 |
35.60 |
83.78 |
564 |
01/97-present |
|
Hawaii Volcanoes |
140 |
19.42 |
155.29 |
1243 |
02/99-present |
|
Olympic |
147 |
48.10 |
123.43 |
2 |
12/97-present |
|
Rocky Mountain |
146 |
40.03 |
105.53 |
2891 |
04/98-present |
|
Sequoia/Kings Canyon |
139 |
36.49 |
118.83 |
610 |
08/98-present |
|
Shenandoah |
137 |
38.52 |
78.44 |
1073 |
03/97-present |
|
Theodore Roosevelt |
131 |
46.90 |
103.38 |
870 |
09/98-present |
|
Virgin Islands |
144 |
18.34 |
64.80 |
250 |
05/98-present |
*Only Big Bend, Everglades, Great Smoky Mountains, and
Shenandoah NPs were presented in Figures 7 and 8
The following graphs show daily DUV integrals at four sites
that had coverage over a significant portion of 1997. Each data point represents
a 5-day running maximum of UV. The graphs display seasonal bell-shaped curves,
with values highest in the summer and lowest in the winter. Big Bend NP had the
highest reported DUV, even though Everglades is located farther south and
Shenandoah NP had higher DUV than Great Smoky Mountains NP.


Daily
DUV Integrals in 1997.
The box and whisker plots shown in the following graphs
summarize the spread of the data in months of the year. The box covers the
middle 50% of the data (the middle two quartiles), with the median given by a
hash mark and the mean by a "+". The whiskers extend to the most
extreme data point or to 1.5 times the length of the box, whichever is less.
Data points beyond the whisker are given individual symbols. The width of the
box is proportional to the number of good data points. The envelope shape of the
seasonal curve, monthly range of values, and peak DUV during the summer all
varies for the four sites.


Statistical summary of
the UV radiation in 1997; A. Big Bend NP; B. Great Smoky Mountains NP; C.
Everglades NP; and D. Shenandoah NP.
Clouds and haze are major factors in determining the daily
DUV and account for most of the variability during the month. Some facets of the
climatology of the sites can be inferred from these plots.
Although daily DUV is the total energy input, it is
concentrated during mid-day when the sun is at minimum zenith angle, which is
determined by the latitude of the site. Daily DUV is also determined by the
length of the day. Therefore, a site like Denali NP will have a more pronounced
seasonal cycle than a site like Everglades NP, but the summertime maximum values
at Denali may be surprising high due to the length of day at that latitude. More
information on the UV network is available at http://www.epa.gov/uvnet.
Back to Top

UV Publications
and Links of Interest
Natural Resource Information Division Fact Sheet,
Measuring Ultraviolet Radiation in National Park Service Units
NOAA press release on Antartic ozone hole (* pdf file)
Information from Sci-Tec about the Brewer
spectrophotometer. Or see the Sci-Tec home
page.
US Global Change Research Program - The interagency ultraviolet radiation program is described in more detail at this web
site.
A centralized UV-B calibration facility is operated by NOAA for the calibration and intercomparison of
the Brewer instruments and other UV-B instruments used by the interagency ultraviolet radion program.
Their work and some pictures of their activities are presented.
* pdf files require the Adobe Acrobat reader to view and print. Get a free copy
HERE.
Back to Top
|